Plate Positioning Perfected

Consider a positive precision plate device to overcome the risks and uncertainties inherent with springs and spring limiters.


Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon

The growing need for more sophisticated molds means there also is a growing need to ensure mold plates are positioned consistently and precisely during processing and to maintain those positions over time without fail. Two of the issues more sophisticated molds are creating are (1) the need to eject parts using a stripper plate and (2) the need to eject more complex parts, such as those with protrusions or undercuts.

Stripper Plates

Stripper plates are used with parts like caps and closures because they effectively eliminate the ejector system and grab the part from its perimeter. Stripper plates tend to offer cleaner ejection since they eject from along the entire perimeter of the molded part, rather than a number of isolated points within the molded part interior. This can result in smoother, more positive ejection and fewer ejector marks on the molded part.

Additionally, as the perimeter of the molded part tends to cool faster than its interior and because a stripper plate commonly has a greater effective area applying the ejector force, ejection can frequently occur sooner and faster than with traditional ejector systems.

Historically, when moldmakers built molds with stripper plates, they would typically use springs to actuate plate movement and stripper bolts to control or stop plate movement. Each spring has a tolerance on its length, in both the free and compressed states. Mold designers sometimes incorporate a certain initial spring compression in their designs to minimize the impact of this variance, but this variance cannot be eliminated.

Springs wear over time, leading to continuous changes in both free and compressed lengths, further complicating the issue of variance. And since stripper plates are often used on molds running high-volume parts, the wear tends to happen sooner rather than later.


Spring Wear

Determining the rate at which a spring will wear is difficult at best, especially since the rate of wear varies from spring to spring—even among springs from the same manufacturing lot. There are multiple tolerances and variances that must be accounted for when installing springs. And they will increase as the springs are actuated over the life of the mold.

Mold maintenance should include periodic checking of springs, replacing them as necessary. Ideally, springs should be replaced just prior to the end of their useful life (although gauging exactly when a spring reaches this point is difficult to quantify precisely). As springs are most commonly installed as a set that must act in concert to evenly move the plate(s), it’s important to catch the first spring at the stage when it’s approaching the end of its useful life. At that time all springs in that particular set should be replaced. It is not recommended that individual springs within a set be replaced at alternate times.

To get around these drawbacks, designers may use spring limiters, such as stripper bolts. Threads on a stripper bolt, however, will stretch over time. Stripper bolts also should be monitored as part of regular mold maintenance. As with springs, there are tolerances and variances on the overall lengths and/or the position at which stripper bolts are installed into the mold. And just like springs, these tolerances and variances will change with usage. The rate of change is impossible to gauge in advance and will vary with each stripper bolt. Stripper bolts also should be installed and replaced as a set as soon as any one of the set begins to show fatigue or stretch.

For those looking to operate without the risks and uncertainties inherent with springs and spring limiters and aren’t interested in the time and resources it takes to create an elaborate plate precision device of their own, there is an off-the-shelf positive precision plate device that overcomes these challenges.


Internal Latch Locks

Anyone who is building a mold with a moving plate should consider, or at least know more about, these devices to make design and manufacture of the mold easier and more consistent.

Internal latch locks (see Figure 1) are built with hard steel, which significantly reduces wear and variance issues. The steel can’t be accidentally altered once it has been cut, and once installed, there are no adjustments that can accidentally change. This means the mold plate will always maintain the precise position.

The internal latch lock enables one plate, or group of plates, to be latched together while the first parting line opening occurs. Then, after a predetermined amount of travel, the latch lock releases the latched plate or group of plates for the remaining parting line (or lines) to open (see Figure 2).

When compared to springs, internal latch locks will ultimately save time and costs while increasing speed and efficiency. Most importantly, the mold plate will always be in the precise position.


Difficult Ejection

Two-stage ejection is a seldom used but growing capability that molders are challenged with as parts become more complex and more needs to be done without secondary operations. Some molders are using hydraulic cylinders, which actuate the second ejector stroke once the knock-out rod’s first ejector stroke is complete.


Two-Stage Ejector

For moldmakers and molders struggling to overcome the challenges of complex part ejection, standard 2-stage ejector technology should be considered (see Figure 3). With this technology available in two types—top last and bottom last—2-stage ejectors accomplish the translation of the single movement of the knock-out rod into two movements of the ejector plates. This technology is needed when molding complex parts such as those with protrusions or undercuts. Often it is used with multi-cavity molds, but that is not a requirement. Two-stage ejectors never touch the parts and do not eliminate the need for ejector pins; however, they help to more precisely time the movement of the ejector pins (see Figures 4a,b).

It is typically recommended that 2-stage ejectors be installed in even numbered pairs (2, 4, 6 or 8). Four is the most recommended because you can put one in each corner. When the components are added opposite and symmetrical of one another, they tend to work best.

As with internal latch locks, 2-stage ejectors are made with hardened steel to ensure precision and drastically reduce wear or variance issues.



While designing molds with springs may be most familiar to those who have worked with springs, more designers—both experienced and new to the industry—are becoming acquainted with internal latch locks and 2-stage ejectors. And many are finding they can be implemented to provide advantages in reliability, precision and overall productivity gains for their customers.

Although the ultimate benefits of operation are reaped by the molder, as a moldmaker, incorporating this technology into your molds provides a competitive advantage. It results in a better mold that requires less maintenance: an attribute that your customers will no doubt appreciate.