AMBA Files Formal Comments for Tariff Reinstatement
The American Mold Builders Association filed formal comments with the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative requesting it not extend the exclusion granted to importers from paying a 25% tariff on plastic injection molds from China for another year.
On November 29, the American Mold Builders Association (AMBA) filed formal comments with the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) requesting it not extend the exclusion granted to importers from paying a 25% tariff on plastic injection molds from China for another year. Importers and manufacturers had until November 30, 2019, to register their support or opposition for extending the tariff suspension or reinstating the 25% tariff on Chinese imports. The comments were requested ahead of the scheduled December 28, 2019, deadline, when the USTR is scheduled to reinstate the tariffs.
“AMBA members report they have the capacity, capabilities and willingness to meet current and future mold building demand,” the AMBA comments stated. To counter the lack of supply argument presented by some importers, AMBA demonstrated to the federal government that the U.S. has 1,439 mold building establishments; has nearly $500 million in open mold building capacity; maintains a utilization rate of 75%; can match China delivery times while exceeding quality; that molds are available from third countries with Canada the largest importer; and that U.S. molds are critical to national and economic security.
The formal submission to USTR identified, “A recent survey by Harbour Results, Inc., manufacturing consultants with an expertise in downstream industries, showed that 60 percent of mold builders reported losing more business in 2019 to low-cost countries compared to previous years.”
“We recognize the challenges seeking structural reforms in China and applaud USTR for working to address these issues long overlooked by previous administrations,” said Kym Conis, managing director with the AMBA. She continued, “However, we remain concerned too many [import exclusion] requesters are using price as their primary motivation for requesting a 301 tariff exclusion extension and have not made significant efforts to identify U.S. or third-country alternatives, which are readily available.”
In July 2018, the U.S. Government imposed a 25% tariff on imported plastic injection molds from China, however, granted a 12-month exclusion from the tariffs for U.S. importers on December 28, 2018. Over 150 mold building manufacturers have filed comments opposing an extension of the tariff suspension, clearly demonstrating sufficient capacity exists in the U.S. to meet the demand from importers.
The AMBA looks forward to working with the Trump administration to strengthen manufacturing in the U.S. and making sure American mold builders continue to provide thousands of jobs across this country and supplying plastic injection molds for decades to come.
To view the AMBA comments filed on November 29, click here.
Related Content
-
MMT Chats: A More Modern NPE “Made for You”
The Plastics Industry Association is making NPE 2024 a “can’t miss”’ experience with more of everything – education, exhibitors and networking! The PLASTICS Industry Association Chief Operating Officer Glenn Anderson and Director of Trade Show Marketing Damaris Piraino share what’s in store for attendees of next year’s May 6-10, 2024 in Orlando, Florida.
-
MoldMaking Conference Session Spotlight: Data
Want to learn about digital workflows in mold design or ERP or global mold monitoring and asset management or the impact of tooling digitalization?
-
Certified Quality Management for Plastics Professionals – Materials to Tooling to Recycling
Why is certification of a shop’s quality management system to ISO 9001, AS9100, IATF 16949 or ISO 13485 so special? What does the certification signify? And what supports the paper behind the framed certificate?
