Saving Money with Gas-Assist Analysis
How to use simulation results to save money.
Gas-assist technology simulates the gas-assisted injection molding process, where gas is injected into the polymer melt. Gas-assist simulation was developed about 15 years ago. In the last two years, the technology has evolved dramatically with the introduction of full 3-D analysis. The gas drives the polymer through the mold cavity to complete mold filling and create a network of hollow channels throughout the component. Using gas-assist technology, you can determine where to position plastic and gas entrances, how much plastic to inject prior to gas injection, where to place gas channels, and how large to size them.
With ever-increasing capabilities, a question remains for tool builders: How do I use the simulation results to save money?
Before the results are addressed, let’s determine what is required to perform an analysis. If you have had any analysis performed in the past, you know that you need a CAD file and a specific material to get started. For gas assist analysis, you also will need to define the gas injection process method—whether the molder is using gas volume control or gas pressure control. The analysis provides the flexibility of where to gate the part and where to inject the gas. We also must define when to inject the gas based on the percentage of the cavity volume filled.
Gas-assist technology simulates the plastic injection phase, with melt filling the cavity partially or completely as required. Process conditions, runner and cavity flow balancing, and material selection can all be optimized through this analysis.
Once the polymer injection phase is complete, analysis of the gas injection phase begins at a user-defined time or cavity fill level. The technology predicts the location of gas blow-through of the polymer flow front during fill, which results in short shots and unacceptable part quality.
Independent gas and polymer injection locations can be selected. The simulations indicate pressure increase or decrease during the injection phase, followed by the gas pressure history as gas expands into the melt.
With so many inputs to control, getting useful results really depends on what you want out of the analysis. Savvy companies spend a lot of time upfront working with customers to define the objectives of the analysis. When success has been achieved in the past, companies can save time by focusing on particular needs. Very few projects have the exact same needs, but there are some common themes among gas assist projects.
Optimizing gas injection locations is the most frequent objective for tool shops. It’s important to adjust the number and location of gas injection points to achieve a particular wall thickness or part weight. The gas injection pressure and timing have a tremendous impact on the shape of the gas penetration. The illustration in Figure 1 allows customers to review the shape of the gas inside the cavity.
When the gas injection location is fixed by the part design, a common objective is defining the gas injection process to minimize part weight. At this point, users also can define the point at which blowout occurs.
Savings and Benefits
As with most simulation tools, the cost savings comes in the form of minimizing cycle time and material usage. For tool builders, there is the added savings of knowing you won’t have to change gating for the plastic or the gas after the tool is built. With the wide range of results available, it is essential that you know what you want out of the analysis before you start.
Other objectives for which you might consider using gas-assist simulation include:
- Properly sizing gas channels for optimal filling and gas penetration
- Determining the best gas channel layout to control gas penetration
- Injecting gas through multiple gas pins simultaneously or at varying times
- Detecting inadequate gas penetration and proper shot size to avoid gas blow-outs
- Determining gas pressure to avoid short shots
- Optimizing injection speed
- Determining injection pressure and clamp force requirements
- Incorporating delay time prior to inject-ing gas
- Establishing final part weight after gas injection
- Estimating final wall thickness after gas penetration
Gas-assist analysis is an economical methodology to simulate plastic injection in applications that utilize injected gas into polymers. Companies can save time and money by using the technology early in the design phase to predict material flow, select optimal polymer injection locations, and determine pressure values. Implementing these measures prior to the actual injection process on the shop floor, companies can save significantly on cycle time and material usage once the injection process is completed.
Integrated CAD/CAM software that combines CAD, CAM, electrode design and CMM programming capabilities in one system can save you time and effort in the following five ways:
Negative stock shutoff can help you make better molds in less time. Here is a clear definition and description of the process. While the concept is fairly simple, the implementation can be challenging.
The world of CAD offers many alternatives to shops that want to use the latest 3-D technology for their mold design. This article looks at the benefits of the various approaches and offers some tips on choosing the most appropriate one.