Collaborating with Competitors

Shops willing to work with their competition to solve common problems and avoid making the same mistakes could potentially improve not only their own operations, but U.S. manufacturing as a whole.
#leadership #regulations


Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon

The Southern California Manufacturing Group gathers to discuss one member's new machine.

“There’s plenty of work to go around.” These words were uttered by two different people, whom I interviewed for two different articles, in response to a question about why the benefits of working together with competing shops outweigh the potential risks. Both sources also agree that collaborating to solve common problems and avoid making the same mistakes could help ensure that U.S. manufacturers continue to enjoy “plenty of work to go around” in the future. However, their respective organizations represent very different models for this collaboration.   

One of those sources, Shaun Karn of Hi-Tech Mold & Engineering, serves as co-chair of the Original Equipment Supplier Association (OESA) Tooling Forum, which is profiled in MoldMaking Technology’s January issue. Conceived in September 2012, the forum aims to provide independent automotive tool vendors with a collective voice as well as a means to discuss common problems and share best practices. Representatives from 25 member shops meet monthly to explore such topics as PPAP payment terms, workforce development, supplier audits, benchmarking and more. Beyond the catharsis that comes with discussing what keeps everyone up at night, the group offers concrete deliverables that can provide real market intelligence and insights that could potentially impact the bottom line (among the most notable of these deliverables is the 2013 Vendor Tooling Study). Click here to learn more.

The second source is S&H Machine’s David Fisher, who founded a tighter-knit group that takes collaboration even further. The Southern California Manufacturing Group (SCMG) consists of seven Los Angeles-area shops that share even the most intimate details of their operations. That’s a significant difference from the OESA Tooling Forum, which tends to keep discussions to broader, strategic level topics. Another distinction is that the SCMG consists solely of shops that specialize in machining aerospace components (I wrote about the SCMG for our sister publication, Modern Machine Shop, before transferring to MoldMaking Technology a few months ago). Nonetheless, Mr. Fisher’s stated hope is that other shops in other industries will form their own peer groups to ensure the United States maintains a stable community of competitive manufacturers, and I see no reason why moldmakers couldn’t follow the SCMG’s model.

Click here to learn more about what makes the group tick. I'm also curious about your thoughts—specifically, whether you'd consider something like this and what you view as the potential risks and benefits of collaborating with competitors. Just send me an email.


  • Mold Cooling Optimization From a Moldmaker's Perspective

    Mold cooling is the single most important factor in terms of mold productivity. Mold cooling improvements will influence cycle time and part quality - both of which will directly impact profitability.

  • The Primary Strengths and Weaknesses of the U.S. Economy

    Studying, analyzing, and forecasting the North American moldmaking industry for the past 20 years has taught me a lot. It has deepened my understanding of things such as innovation, initiative and industriousness. But the most important thing I have learned, is the meaning of “competition.”

  • It’s Time to Reevaluate Co-Injection Technology

    With the development of new resins, hot runners and controls technology, co-injection is positioned to move from a niche market application to mainstream acceptance in the upcoming years.