Is ISO 9001: 2000 Worth It?
A discussion on whether or not your shop should pursue the following registrations: ISO9001: 2000, ISO/TS 16949, AS 9100, ISO 13485, ISO 17025.
During the past eight years of helping a large number of tool and die companies implement quality management systems to meet ISO 9001 and other standards, the following question has been asked: “Why should I do this?” While there are great answers to this question, this article explains what these companies themselves are saying after they have achieved and held registration over several years.
Moldmaker benefits of a well implemented ISO 9001-based system include:
Another way to think about the benefits is this: your best tool and die person or project manager does not need much documentation for a project; they inherently know what to do and how to react to the issues that arise. The system documentation is really for:
While most mold shops (and other companies) see most or all of the aforementioned benefits, many also see challenges in maintaining a registered and effective ISO 9001-based quality management system. This is normal and typically happens during ongoing organizational changes and periods with very high workload.
The following are some of the struggles and challenges encountered by companies when implementing on ISO. The mold shops sharing their feedback here have between five and 75 people.
When a company has 20 people, they do not have the volume to support a full-time quality manager that spends a significant amount of time on the ISO-based quality management system as well as other quality-related tasks.
In addition, many times they do not have staff that has significant experience creating and managing a formal quality management system. This can result in staff only focusing on the quality management system before audits and not really using it as a tool to operate the business and ongoing work.
A good analogy is that the company ends up with a show car that it brought out and polished before registrar audits; however, this car has no engine and does not take the company where it wants to go. This implementation of a quality management system costs a company considerable money, but does not drive improvement in efficiency or quality. In other words; there is no payback.
Implementation Pitfalls
More specific pitfalls of implementation include the following:
• Too much documentation.
If the system is not carefully established and implemented, many companies write too many procedures and create a nightmare to manage. This occurs during implementation due to a lack of expertise with creating documentation and a fear of nonconformance during a registrar audit. After registration, documentation is oftentimes increased by the addition of procedures and work instructions due to process changes and surveillance audit nonconformance. In most cases, slight modification to current documents is a more effective response. One good approach to documentation is: “If in doubt, leave it out.”
• The company became too busy and put the system on the shelf.
All companies go through peaks and valleys of workloads. It is okay to postpone audits and some system-related tasks; however, a company must return to a systemic focus and complete responsibilities and quality system tasks. When a company is extremely busy is when the system is most needed.
• Purchased a software package or a set of procedures.
Companies buy software, pre-written procedures and computer systems that are supposed to make it easier. The process itself is not complicated to start with and the software typically does not fit very well. If you start with paper and simple spreadsheets, you will find what you really need. Then if you want to consider software, you will know the features and structure you really want.
These common challenges faced by companies maintaining and improving their ISO 9001-based quality systems are not difficult to overcome, but do require focus and attention. They do not require large continuing investments in time or money if a company just consistently invests small amounts of resources and continues with a focus on quality when managing their jobs and business.
So, if you want to implement an ISO 9001-based quality system or improve your present system, the following are some goals on which you should focus.
A good ISO 9001 based management system should take only a handful of hours per week to manage and use. This amount of time also should come back in the form of less rework, less searching for customer and job information, and better business performance. However, if the system is over documented or ineffective, a company will spend more time on the documented system without the increased payback.
Ask your present customers and research what certifications your potential new customers are requiring of their suppliers. Many smaller companies are pursuing additional certifications as a way to diversify and attract new customers. Here are some of the most common certifications typically required in addition to or based on ISO 9001:
When implementing and improving your management system or responding to nonconformance from your registrar you should:
Many companies that have been assisted with ISO implementation have experienced the following:
With the struggles in different sectors of manufacturing in the U.S. today—including the automotive supply chain—more companies that are traditionally automotive mold shops are looking to expand and diversify in different areas.
This is an important time to take a close look at your customer base and look for ways to expand and diversify as well as looking for internal improvements in quality, service and efficiency. A well implemented quality management system can be an important tool.