Progressive Components
Published

U.S. Is Still a Primary Manufacturing Resource

Over past year, we’ve seen the weak U.S. dollar and exorbitant fuel/shipping costs cause U.S. companies to reconsider near-shoring as a cost-effective option, and adjust their outsourcing strategies to include near-shoring of some products. But as of this writing, the U.S. dollar has risen 30 percent over the past two months. Fuel costs are falling rapidly, and the costs to ship goods from overseas are coming down with them. The U.S. economy is very sick, and recovery is expected to be long and tough.

Share

So, are the positives we’ve seen recently that made the U.S. a preferred source country for manufacturing no longer valid?

Hardly. While the aforementioned costs have indeed decompressed, other issues have replaced them that will continue the near-sourcing trends of the past 12 months.

Your prospects in the U.S. must still consider the total cost of ownership. The global financial crisis makes inventory a really BAD thing, due to the unpredictable future behaviors of consumers (“What if I have to sit on this product; What if it won’t sell?”). Long, global supply chains simply aren’t very efficient for maintaining a just in time inventory strategy. The fact is, volatility of the global markets makes reducing logistics costs and better management of supply chains just as important today as the fuel and currency conditions did months ago. Add to that the continuing inflation and rising labor costs in China, and the options to cut costs and reduce long-term inventory risks are pretty clear.

Quality is the bugaboo that we warned everyone about. While China and Asia in general are improving their technology adoption and competence, they are still a long way from feed and speed and design nirvana. The costs and effort to maintain quality for high-tolerance parts and complex assemblies long-distance—while acceptable a few years ago—are now being scrutinized as potential cost targets. Costs to rework or repair products with unacceptable tolerances and quality are becoming less acceptable, as well. Localized or regional manufacturing makes sense in any environment for many higher-tech or high-demand products, for the same reason that cellular manufacturing and lean principles work—they reduce waste, require less resources to manage and directly contribute to the bottom line.

Green manufacturing isn’t going away. Despite the distractions of the economic turmoil, the green cow of manufacturing and business is out of the barn. Its impact on costs is becoming more obvious to pragmatic, cost-conscious buying organisms. The simple truth is: global supply chains aren’t green. Manufacturing nearer the source is.

We hear from manufacturers everyday that are seeing work coming back from Asia and other low-cost countries, and they cite these same reasons for regaining this work. It’s not a tsunami yet, but it is happening.

The mantra of “free and open markets” that fueled the dogma of off-shoring over the past decade works both ways. In the 80s when outsourcing many corporate functions was en vogue, companies began to realize that not all functions were best maintained outside their corporate walls—and they pulled those roles and functions back in-house. We’re seeing some of the same dialing in today as companies realize that sourcing is a balance, and that the knee-jerk reaction to the low-hanging fruit of low-cost manufacturing may not be low cost after all.

How the economy goes is still up in the air. Uncertainty will hang over us for the first months of 2009. But understanding these shifts and how they’re happening can help manufacturers to not just survive and thrive in volatile times—capitalizing on them may be key to attracting and retaining work to our country.

YCM Technology (USA) Inc.
Techspex
Aquilo Cold Deck LSR Systems by Mastip Inc.
NPE2024: The Plastics Show
VERISURF
Gardner Business Intelligence
Kor-Lok
DUOFLOW
Entegris Poco Materials
Order 24/7 from the DME eSTORE
Next-Generation Lathe
MoldMaking Technology Magazine

Related Content

Editorial Guidelines: Editorial Advisory Board

The Editorial Advisory Board of MoldMaking Technology is made up of authorities with expertise within their respective business, industry, technology and profession. Their role is to advise on timely issues, trends, advances in the field, offer editorial thought and direction, review and comment on specific articles and generally act as a sounding board and a conscience for the publication.

Read More

ICYMI--MMT Chats: What's Happening to Our Industry? Time to Take a Stand for Plastics

MoldMaking Technology Editorial Director Christina Fuges chats with Bob Schiavone, Global Marketing Director for R&D/Leverage about his passion for manufacturing, marketing and the mission to change the perception of plastics. This episode is brought to you by ISCAR with New Ideas for Machining Intelligently.

Read More
Marketing

MMT Chats: Simple Steps to Get Your Social Media Campaign Started

MoldMaking Technology Editorial Director Christina Fuges catches up with Gail Now’s Chief Curiosity Officer Gail Robertson. We talk about the importance of using the curiosity tool to tell your stories as part of a marketing strategy that includes social media.   This episode is brought to you by ISCAR with New Ideas for Machining Intelligently.

Read More
sales

MMT Chats: Marketing’s Impact on Mold Manufacturing

Kelly Kasner, Director of Sales and Marketing for Michiana Global Mold (MGM) talks about the benefits her marketing and advertising, MGM’s China partnership and the next-generation skills gap. This episode is brought to you by ISCAR with New Ideas for Machining Intelligently.  

Read More

Read Next

Basics

How to Use Continuing Education to Remain Competitive in Moldmaking

Continued training helps moldmakers make tooling decisions and properly use the latest cutting tool to efficiently machine high-quality molds.

Read More
EcoONE Hot Runner Solutions