
MACHINING
How to Choose the
Right Toolholder
The importance of choosing the optimum toolholder is substantial as the
quality of the toolholder has a great influence on the results of the complete machining process.
|
|
LEARNMORE
Selecting the Best Toolholding Solution for Your Shop
A look at ER collet systems and a review of the properties to look for when making your toolholding purchase decision. Accessorize Your Machine to Maximize Performance and Efficiency High Speed Balancing Act Although it has minor importance with regard to value when compared to a complete machining center, the toolholder is an important connection between the machine spindle and the cutting tool. The importance in choosing the optimum toolholder is substantial as the quality of the toolholder has a great influence on the results of the complete machining process. The most important requirements for a toolholder are the gripping force at high speeds as well as the run-out accuracy and balancing quality, which reduce vibrations. Toolholders need to have a run-out accuracy of less than 0.003 mm. To support the high dynamic of the linear actuation of the machine, a low weight of the spindle, toolholder and tool combination is beneficial to receive superior cutting results. Customer requirements with regard to the cutting results of a toolholder are usually clearly defined and there are different types of toolholders available in the market that could fulfill these requirements. Depending on the specific application of the customer, it will be possible to find the perfect toolholding system as the different systems offer different technical features and advantages. We will concentrate on the following four kinds of toolholders: (1) hydraulic toolholders, (2) toolholders for polygonal clamping, (3) universal toolholders and (4) heat shrinking holders. Hydraulic Toolholders
Figure 1: Hydraulic toolholder. Figures courtesy of Schunk, Inc. A hydraulic toolholder uses a different way of clamping the cutting tool compared to systems of conventional toolholders. Introduction of force is done via a screw (with a screw, a piston and sealing). By actuating (turning) the screw, an even hydraulic pressure is generated inside the toolholder. This pressure is transmitted via a steel expansion sleeve, which clamps the tool. With this clamping system, best run-out accuracy and a repeatability of less than 0.003 mm (0.00012”) are achieved. As the cutting tool is held in a hydraulic chamber, the toolholder offers superior damping effects, due to the oil in the holder. The user gets a higher surface quality of the workpiece and higher up-times of the toolholder as small eruptions of material, as a result of vibrations of the cutter, are avoided. These toolholders are not only maintenance-free and resistant against dirt, but they also are easy to use and offer a safe clamping of the cutting tool. Toolholders for Polygonal Clamping
Figure 2: Polygonal clamping system. For high-speed applications, polygonal clamping is a great solution since the clamping of the tool shank is done by the elastic deformation of the holder. The main advantage of these toolholders is its extremely slim design. There are two versions available on the market to cover different applications. A slim version of the toolholder, which stands out with its extremely slim design of the tool shank and its long reach of the tool. It is even possible to use shorter cutting tools with this holder, which in return, results in lower costs for the user. The rigid version of the toolholder has a bigger, and therefore, stiffer body of the holder and offers better qualities with regard to radial force compensation. Both versions can be used with long extensions, which make them even more flexible for difficult machining tasks. Clamping of the tool or an extension is done within the elastic range of the material of the tool shank. Therefore, there are no restrictions with regard to the lifetime of the tool. Changing a tool can be done within seconds by using an external clamping device. This device does not need any external power source and therefore can be used anywhere. This fact makes polygonal clamping systems very interesting for applications that require a frequent tool change. Universal Toolholders
Figure 3: Universal toolholders. These toolholders clamp tools using expansion technology similar to hydraulic toolholders, only the expansion is achieved via mechanical means instead of through a hydraulic fluid medium. This results in a toolholder system that provides the user with vibration damping and high runout accuracy—less than 0.005mm measured at the face of the toolholder. Additional features of universal toolholders—when compared to colleted-style toolholder systems—are the ability to tighten the toolholders to a hard stop (no torque wrenches are required); a tight and secure clamping of the entire shank of the round tool (collets clamp more tightly near the nose of the toolholder and less tightly at the bottom of the clamping bore); flexible clamping through the use of standard intermediate sleeves; and, very accurate axial length adjustment through the use of an internal length adjustment screw. Heat Shrinking Technology
Figure 4: Heat shrinking holder. An induction coil—with some units using a high frequency coil—heats up the toolholder precisely at the area where the tool has to be inserted. After inserting the cutting tool, you need to cool the toolholder, which can be done via a cooling jacket. Cooling down the toolholder will cause the holder to shrink around the cutting tool shank. In this way, the cutting tool is clamped and offers a force conclusive grip, which allows high torques. The result of the shrinking process is an almost homogeneous tool with many advantages. Main benefits of the heat shrinking technology include high run-out accuracy of less than 0.003 mm, high transmissible torques and a relatively slim toolholder design. If it comes to vibration dampening, hydraulic toolholders or polygonal toolholders offer better qualities than heat shrinking toolholders. Summary A comparison of the different tool-holders is very difficult, as they offer different benefits with regard to working principle, design and measures. A rating should only be done when considering the requirements of the particular application at the same time. A very rigid tool-holder is not appropriate for every application. A toolholder, which is perfectly suitable for high-speed machining, may not offer the needed values with regard to some other requirements. |
| MoldMaking Technology Online is a trademark of Gardner Publications, Inc, copyright 2008. MoldMaking Technology and all contents are properties of Gardner Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved. |