Feature Article - How to Fix Family Mold Problems With Flow Simulation

FEATUREARTICLE

How to Fix Family Mold Problems With Flow Simulation

Mold flow simulation is important to use when building a mold, but it also can help moldmakers solve flow problems after the mold is built.

GETMOREINFO

For more information contact MoldTech Analysis and Design, LLC (Jackson, MS) at (601) 932-3715, via e-mail at engineering@moldtechanalysis.com or via its website at www.moldtechanalysis.com.

MMTTOOLS

Print This Article

It is well known that family molds can decrease tooling and production costs. However, family molds always will have some inherent problems. Flow simulation - when properly applied - can solve some of these problems, even after tooling has been produced. The following example demonstrates the effectiveness of flow simulation on family molds.

Exide Technologies, Inc. (Princeton, NJ) - one of the largest makers of automotive batteries worldwide - was producing a family of parts that were similar in geometry to a product they already produced. The only difference was that the new parts were approximately 15 percent larger; an increase Exide thought was negligible. During tooling production, Exide chose to bypass flow analysis because of the many similarities in the new parts and the parts they currently produced. This would prove to be a costly assumption.

Figure 1: Melt contribution for individual gates.

Exide built its family mold using the same runner design as its smaller family mold and simply increased the size of the runners and gates. During tooling trials, one of the parts repeatedly produced short shots. When it did fill, the other part flashed badly. Also, both of the parts exhibited significant warpage.

The mold had a small part with a nominal thickness of 0.007" and a larger part with a nominal thickness of 0.015". The mold design used four drops to feed eight runners on each part. The runners and gates were all the same geometry.

Solving the Problem
Analysis of the individual parts showed that the leading cause for the high degree of warpage was the flow imbalance caused by multi-gating. Multiple gates are often recommended for long panel-type parts to decrease warpage because of material orientation effects. Eight gates proved to be excessive in this case. The excessive number of gates produced a complex material orientation, increasing residual stresses and thus resulting in warpage. The matters also were made worse by a lead (high heat capacity) insert in one of the parts that produced a heat sink - decreasing the flow front temperature at one area of the part.

Figure 2: Analysis of the parts with the runner system.

Figure 1 shows the melt contribution for the individual gates in different colors. Ideally, each of the bands should be of equal width with a straight overlap. Here it can be seen that the melt from some of the gates actually changes its flow direction, leading to an uneven material orientation. Figure 2 shows one of the analyses of the parts with the runner system. This graphic reveals a more serious problem with runner balancing. The bigger part, which had a higher nominal thickness, would fill first and over pack. Also, the clamp tonnage results shows that it had exceeded the machine limit of 300 tons. This led to severe flashing and high part weight. Further analysis with a reduced injection rate or injection pressure made the smaller part not fill out completely. These analyses showed that the oversized runners (0.25") on both of the parts diminished the "Molding Window," or the range of parameters in which the mold can successfully produce parts.

Figure 3: Achieving uniform filling.

With these results in mind, one of the recommendations was to shut the two outer drops completely to the bigger part - the one that filled first (see Figure 3). This ensured that both of the parts filled almost at the same time. By filling both of the parts at the same time, the over-packing situation was avoided. This ensured that the clamp tonnage (250 tons) was under the machine limit of 300 tons. Also, the bulk stress levels on both of the parts were under the recommended value.

On any molding project, it is best to apply mold flow design principles at the earliest stage possible. This not only serves to the overall success of the project, but also eliminates expensive retooling costs. Even a very crude analysis done at an earlier stage will answer some important questions like probability of fill, cycle time, machine requirements and runner sizing, just to name a few. However, this example also demonstrates that an effective application of mold flow simulations as a troubleshooting tool at the production stage also will produce useful knowledge and solutions.