
AUTOMATIONCASESTUDY
The Center of Automation
Macro pallet-mounted gage balls reduce overall costs in electrode machining/manufacturing and reduce leadtime by 25 percent.
|
|
|
GETMOREINFO
For more information contact JK Molds Inc. at (909) 981-0993 For more information visit the MMT Showroom for Len Graham Consulting or (602) 284-3114 JK Molds Inc. (Upland, CA)—a manufacturer of high-volume, close-tolerance plastic injection molds specializing in the medical industry but also serving the home appliance, packaging, telecommunications, consumer products, electronics and healthcare industries—has customers ranging from custom part design firms to Fortune 500 companies at a global level. In business for more than 30 years, this 35-man shop found it had to rethink its strategy when faced with foreign competition, and the answer came in the form of an automation/gage balls combination that ultimately resulted in 25 percent leadtime reductions. “The global market has been a challenge for us,” acknowledges JK Molds Managing Partner Jason Van Noy. “So, we decided we needed to automate to compete.” Over the years, the company had been investing in the latest equipment, but found it needed more leverage to ensure its long-term survival. Enter Len Graham Consulting (Cave Creek, AZ), which specializes in automated mold manufacturing. The company recently developed Model ADP-MI (pronounced “adapt me”) precision gage balls—designed to work in conjunction with System 3R USA, Inc. (Totowa, NJ) and Erowa Technology, Inc. (Chicago, IL) pallet technology—to reduce setup times and eliminate dimensional inconsistency on angles (including compound angles) and radial forms. How They Work According to JK Molds Vice President Patrick Elliott, consistently measuring dimensions with tight tolerance windows is not a problem with this methodology. Len Graham of Len Graham Consulting elaborates, “The gage balls are manufactured and individually certified to repeat to within +/- .0001 of center and also are within .0001 of a certified height from the resting pad of the pallet they are mounted on to the top of the ball. They allow the user to associate design, programming, machining and inspection to one common reference datum for all of these machining/manufacturing-related disciplines.”
Figure 1: JK Molds doing more than just automation. Figure courtesy of JK Molds. The customary method of engineering gage ball dimensions—either from multiple sides of a component or from a gage ball reference somewhere off center of a component and perhaps even requiring machining/mounting the gage ball into the component—is outdated for palletized electrodes and components, Graham continues, as is relying on subjective microscopes/optical comparators for high-tolerance measurements. “The gage balls are set dead center of the pallet and at a repeatable height to within +/- .0001—making both symmetrical and non-symmetrical dimensions on palletized workpieces very easy to measure/achieve and consistent for both CMM and surface plate manual methods of checking the dimensions,” he explains. Graham recommends generating a 3-D model of the part being machined on the pallet with the gage ball superimposed within the unit so the dimensions generated on the electrode/component design can be automatically related to programming, machining and inspection throughout the manufacturing process. Furthermore, programming and inspection also can be associated to the same model in the same fashion. Goals Met “It also helps us with our overall efficiency and communicating information from engineering to the shop floor,” Elliott states. “There are no more questions—when they set up the machine, they know we are going from the center of the gage ball and it’s easier to verify all the numbers. You don’t have to do any calculations—subtract this number from this datum and then check it with some other calculations or build some complicated stacks to check numbers—you just go from the same datum every time. It’s reduced the amount of time needed to calculate stack-ups before machining. Now we are using the global zero point on all of our inspection and that’s reduced that time significantly.” Fortunately JK Molds’ employees were up to speed with the new technology within several months’ time, which Van Noy attributes to his employees exceptional math and conceptual skills they already pos-sessed. Initially, the company held several meetings to discuss the global zero point and to make sure all engineering drawings thereafter would reflect that datum. Elliott adds that the combination of automation and gage balls has really made a difference in getting work done better, faster and smarter. “Just investing in automation doesn’t fix anything,” he cautions. “You have to rethink the way you are doing things from the beginning all the way through the end—looking at every process in the shop. When you make the decision to go with this system, you have to be ready to change your entire mold design and build process. It’s a lot more planning upfront and a lot more visualizing the entire process of how a job is going to run through the shop. If you aren’t committed to change, you won’t continue to be successful.”
|
|
| MoldMaking Technology Online is a trademark of Gardner Publications, Inc, copyright 2008. MoldMaking Technology and all contents are properties of Gardner Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved. |