
MACHINING
Part One of a Three-Part Series
Learn how to evaluate your shop’s productivity
and begin increasing it by considering the
variables of implementing hard milling and high-speed machining.Five Steps for Improving Your Shop’s Maximum Productivity |
|
LEARNMORE
• This is Part I of a multi-part series. To continue to Part II click here.
It is safe to say that many mold shops are not up to date with all the processes and products on the market because these shops are comfortable with the systems they have in place and don’t believe it is necessary to continue their education on what they could do to become more efficient. And then shops that are making investments are only making partial improvements, and are therefore disappointed because they are not seeing the results they were told to expect. One Process at a Time Approach Case Study #1 Solution: A replaceable insert milling cutter and the application was recommended. Feed, speed and programming path were changed and the testing was finished at 36 inches per minute and nine pockets were completed with one insert.
Figure 1: DM mlling system for high-speed machining and hard milling. Figures courtesy of Horn USA. Case Study # 2 Solution: After an evaluation of the application and process, it was determined that the machine controller was filtering out most of the code. Simply stated the program tolerance was set at .0001 and the controller tolerance was set at .0004. After changing the controller tolerance to match the program tolerance the finish was improved greatly (see Figure 1). This three-part series will delve into the five components of achieving maximum shop productivity that moldmakers must consider when taking it one process at a time: finishing components by hard milling not EDM sinking; machining the components unattended; knowing the difference between HSM and conventional machining; using hard milling instead of jig grinding; and, learning when to high-speed machine before hard milling. Following the example set by the two aforementioned case studies, below are five areas where you can begin to evaluate your shop’s productivity and then begin to increase it. Five Quick and Simple Recommendations 1. Finish Components by Hard Milling Not EDM Sinking 2. Machine the Components Unattended 3. Know the Difference between High-Speed Machining and Conventional Machining 4. Use Hard Milling Instead of Jig Grinding
Figure 2: DS system for HSM and hard milling. It can take up to 10 minutes or longer to jig grind a .750" diameter dowel pinhole. By using a hard milling process the same hole can be machined in less the five minutes. If you are interested in using this process on a machine in your shop, a ball bar test on your machining center is required to show your machine’s capabilities (see Figure 2). 5. Learn When to High-Speed Machine Before Hard Milling If the mold size is greater than a cell phone mold, generally the part is roughed with HSM first. The process of removing a bulk of the material via a HSM will take a lot less time than trying to hard mill all that material. In addition, tool life of a high-speed cutter can be more than 40 hours in soft steel at speeds more than 200 inches per minute. Hard milling in the same material after heat treat can result in a cycle time more than 200 percent greater and only achieve 50 percent of the tool life. That is why it is recommended to use hard milling for adding the finish and tolerance and not as a roughing process. These five principles have been thoroughly tested, and can be applied in your shop. Next month we will examine more closely the reasons and justification behind moving your component finishing operation from EDM sinking to hard milling with the right machine, software, cutters, toolholders and training—focusing on the lessons learned from a specific application. The next installment also will show how you can add machine time to your shop through lights out machining. It will discuss the reasons shops have not taken the plunge into machining components unattended and share the steps to implementing this strategy. |
| MoldMaking Technology Online is a trademark of Gardner Publications, Inc, copyright 2008. MoldMaking Technology and all contents are properties of Gardner Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved. |