
QUALITY/INSPECTION
Gage Calibration:
When in Doubt Send It Out
A discussion on how gages get calibrated, who calibrates them and where it is performed.
|
|
LEARNMORE
3-D, Non-Contact Scanning for Inspection: What Moldmakers Need to Know
Understanding the differences and similarities between CMM and 3-D scanning allows moldmakers to adapt to, apply and leverage 3-D scanning technology within their shop environment. Machine Tool Probing for Moldmaking Mold Development with Digital Shape Sampling and Processing GETMOREINFO
For more information contact L.S. Starrett Company at (978) 249-3551,
Nothing lasts forever, and so it is with gage accuracy and repeatability. Drop them enough, subject them to the rigors of manufacturing plants, or mar their measuring surfaces from abrasive contact and sooner or later gages need to be re-calibrated. Most quality conscious machinists and inspectors will agree on this, but how gages get calibrated, who calibrates them and where it is performed is a subject worthy of discussion. Aside from the obvious quality pitfalls of using gages that aren’t accurate, avoiding calibration can become very costly in other ways as well. For example, decreased productivity, or losing contracts due to lack of measuring compliance or certification are factors few can afford to risk in today’s extremely competitive environment. With high stakes such as these, one might assume that proper resources, methods and budgets are commonly deployed for calibration programs. On the contrary, it is fairly typical for users to make the mistake of attempting to calibrate their own gages using the wrong methods and/or tools for perceived savings and convenience. It’s Easy, Right? In-house calibration—especially comprehensive, established programs in large companies that have thousands of gages—can be a very effective approach for the right application. However, outsourcing calibration is perhaps the most prudent method for many companies for a variety of reasons, among the most prominent being cost and competence. Outsourcing Reduces Cost, Increases Reliability
Outsourcing provides expertise without the expense that an adequate in-house program requires. Photos courtesy of The L.S. Starrett Company. The break-even expenses have been estimated for those brave enough (or large-scale enough ) to attempt it in-house at well into the thousands. At a minimum, you’re talking around $250,000.00 for initial ramp up with equipment, depending on your application. Then, probably another $100,000.00 for a few technicians—and that’s not including other issues like taking up valuable manufacturing space to build a climate controlled lab. It is estimated that it would cost more than $75,000.00 annually to operate an in-house lab. In other words, unless you have a tremendous number of gages, it is cost-prohibitive to set up an in-house calibration operation. Standard Problems, Quality Solutions Cost isn’t the only advantage when outsourcing. Other critical issues, such as standards, also come into view. Are you an A2LA 17025 accredited source? An appropriately accredited lab will ensure that you meet compliance with today’s standards. Consider also that today’s standard may change tomorrow. Keeping up with the continually changing requirements is difficult at best for those who aren’t plugged in and unfamiliar with the process. Other obvious benefits are improved quality, reliability and convenience. It’s safe to conclude that if you are consistently using a dedicated, independent source, your quality will increase. Plus, larger companies benefit by standardizing their gage calibration and record keeping all within one source.
Technicians perform calibration and repair of all major brands and types of gage. Who Will Do What? Another problem with going to the manufacturer is multiple sourcing. If you have gages from different manufacturers like most people, it becomes difficult trying to send tools to various sources. Be sure they can handle all major brands of gages in one location. Other risks are the type of lab. You may find a good house, perhaps even a specialist in certain product areas, but beware of size. It is not uncommon to see smaller one- or two-person outfits close up shop. Also, look for adequate equipment, experience and ability to service effectively. A good guideline for turnaround is a minimum of three and a maximum of 10 days. Nothing’s Perfect |
| MoldMaking Technology Online is a trademark of Gardner Publications, Inc, copyright 2008. MoldMaking Technology and all contents are properties of Gardner Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved. |