
FEATUREARTICLE
The Addition of Subtraction
Milling is once again a valued rapid prototyping solution because of new subtractive rapid prototyping (SRP) technologies.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GETMOREINFO
For more information contact Will Curtis, public relations for Roland DGA Corporation (Irvine, CA), at (949) 727-2100, ext. 1216 or via e-mail at wcurtis@rolanddga.com.
However, because of new subtractive rapid prototyping (SRP) technologies, milling is once again a valued RP solution. According to Terry Wohler's 2002 Report on Rapid Prototyping & Tooling State of the Industry, engineers and product designers purchased more SRP devices last year than the top two ARP devices combined. Of course, we are not talking about traditional CNC mills. These benchtop SRP milling devices are small, inexpensive and easy to use; yet, they have the power to turn out prototypes of almost any material with better speed and precision than any ARP system. When it comes to producing manufacturable prototypes, SRP devices have found their niche. In fact, the mere act of milling actually verifies a part's manufacturability. "SRP systems have become so sophisticated, engineers now need to understand when the best time is to use which RP technology," says Boris Fritz, chairman of the SME RP Association. "SRP, for example, is great for testing because you can mill the final material." The four leading RP technologies are SRP, SL, 3-D printing and Fused Deposition ModelingT (FDM). With a unique set of pros and cons, each one is best suited for specific RP applications (see Table 1).
Table 1: Leading RP technologies rated on the four-star system. (x = one star)
Subtractive Rapid Prototyping The lower initial equipment costs let designers create prototypes in-house. Engineers can produce prototypes in hours that normally take days to get back from a service bureau. In this way, SRP technology helps protect proprietary secrets and provides greater control over the design process. In addition, manufacturers have optimized today's SRP devices specially for RP. For example, some SRP devices mill a wide range of materials without gumming up the liquid coolant systems found on traditional CNC production mills. These devices also have no requirement for three-phase power, allowing design engineers turn out prototypes right in their offices. At the same time, these SRP devices still offer the power and precision associated with AC servomotors, look-ahead processing, simultaneous fourth-axis controls and automatic tool changers. Finally, manufacturers also have solved SRP's age-old problem with ease of use. Some, for example, offer easy-to-use, seamless functionality between SRP devices and popular CAM software. Such interoperability is bringing machining technology from the shop floor into the design environment.
Stereolithography By tracing a laser beam on the surface of a vat of liquid photopolymer, Fritz builds plastic parts one layer at a time. The material quickly solidifies wherever the laser beam strikes the surface. After each layer is completely traced, he lowers the part a small distance into the vat and a second layer is traced right on top of the first. The self-adhesive property of the material causes the layers to form a complete, 3-D object. "Not a big deal," says Fritz. "You just throw in the part and it's done in a matter of hours." Some parts have overhangs or undercuts that must have support from structures designed and fabricated right along with the object. On completion of the fabrication process, the object is elevated from the vat. Design engineers must then cut off the supports and sand the surface until it is smooth.
3-D Printing These prototypes are perfect for evaluating design, form, shape and even color. Three-dimensional printing provides design engineers with a relatively easy and cost-effective means to touch, feel or grasp the information on their computer screen. From teapots to PDAs, this technology helps a wide variety of products come to market quicker. On the downside, 3-D printing often yields prototypes that are brittle and grainy. The surface finish, although it has improved in recent years, still leaves much to be desired. For a smooth surface, design engineers still must sand these parts by hand.
Fused Deposition ModelingT "The new polycarbonate material is incredibly tough," says Fritz. "At last year's Rapid Prototyping & Manufacturing show, we tested it by smacking a golf ball prototype. We're actually looking into using it as an end product for aerospace applications." Watching a FDM machine run is like watching a fine hot glue gun attached to a vector-based 2-D plotter. A plastic filament is unwound from a coil and supplies material to an extrusion nozzle. The engineer must heat the nozzle to melt the plastic and control the flow of the melted plastic. The nozzle moves over the table in the required geometry and deposits a thin bead of extruded plastic to form each layer. The plastic hardens immediately and bonds to the layer below. The entire system is contained within a chamber that is just below the melting point of the plastic. Although they have improved in recent years, surface finish and accuracy are not among the strong points of FDM. Both surface finish and accuracy rate are lower than SL and SRP methods. Available materials for the process include ABS and investment casting wax. ABS offers good strength, and, more recently, polycarbonate and polysulfone materials have been introduced, which extend the capabilities of the method further in terms of strength and temperature range. For overhanging geometries, engineers can fabricate support structures and break them away from the object later. They also can wash away an available water-soluble support material.
The Right Tool for the Job
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MoldMaking Technology Online is a trademark of Gardner Publications, Inc, copyright 2008. MoldMaking Technology and all contents are properties of Gardner Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved. |