
FEATUREARTICLE
Steel Wars: Aluminum Versus Steel
Conventional steel tools have some obvious advantages in the mold industry but aluminum proves to be gaining some strength in the competition.
|
||||||||||
|
GETMOREINFO
For information contact Michael Skillingberg, vice president of technology for The Aluminum Association, Inc. (Washington, DC), at (202) 862-5121 or via e-mail at mhskilli@aluminum.org or Dr. Warren Hunt, Jr., Ph.D., FASM of Aluminum Consultants Group, Inc. (Murrysville, PA), at (724) 733-1823, via e-mail at mhh@acgroupinc.com or via the Web site www.acgroupinc.com.
With requirements for lowest weight, highest thermal conductivity and ease of machinability, tool and mold applications are a natural opportunity for aluminum. Aluminum producers have responded with often-proprietary and trade-named products tailored to meet the diversity of challenges presented by these applications.
Why Aluminum? Overcoming those deficiencies is where aluminum comes into the picture. Compared to steel, aluminum:
As a result of these benefits aluminum producers estimate that using aluminum over steel for mold applications can save 30 percent in mold manufacturing costs, which can increase to 40 percent if the reduced part production cycle times and improved productivity are included. One area in which steel offers an advantage is in the area of surface hardness. In some applications, such as those involving conventional plastic molding, the base aluminum surface has adequate properties. However, for those cases where higher wear resistance is required, surface treatments of aluminum such as hard anodizing or nickel plating, result in aluminum surface hardness levels approaching those of steel.
Evolution Cast plate materials have the following advantages:
Some of the applications in which cast plate materials have been used include food machinery molding plate and other low pressure molding, electrical heating plates, milling machine bedplate, automatic inspection machine board holder and screen printer base plate.
Wrought aluminum products also are widely applied. The nature of the improvements made to the plate products for use in tool and mold applications involved:
For applications such as low-pressure plastic and composite molding, including thermoforming and resin transfer molding, that require a material with excellent corrosion resistance and weldability, 5xxx alloys are preferred. Similar to 5083-O are alloys such as Fibralr, Giantal, and Alumold 4-150 and 4-110. Other applications such as low-pressure molding of rubber and other elastomers, which involve temperatures in the 350x to 400xF range, necessitate a moderate strength material with good property retention at moderately elevated temperatures. Here, aluminum producers offer alloys based on the 2xxx series, often similar to 2618 or 2219, which are traditionally the best conventional aluminum alloys from a high-temperature perspective. This group includes: Weldural, a 2219-type alloy, Tempralr, with the 2039 alloy composition, Alumold 3-350 and 3-300 and Alumec HT. Another class of applications, particularly injection and compression molding as well as bolsters and force plates, call for high strength properties along with excellent machinability, high polishability and good shape stability. The 7xxx alloy family meets this need well, and products here include Certalr SPC, a 7122 alloy, Hokotol, a 7050-type composition, Alumold 1-600, 1-500, 2-450, and 2-400, and Alumec 79, 89, 99, and QC-7. A survey of wrought tool and mold plate products would not be complete without mentioning moderate strength alloys of the 6xxx series. Specialized versions of 6061-T6 in stress relieved tempers are available both in plate as compression stress relieved thick 6061-T652 or 6061-T651 Type 200 plate as well as extruded form Acc-U-Plate and Econ-O-Plate. In addition, a higher-purity 6xxx for semiconductor applications in which anodizing is needed called Semi6 is offered. Also, 6013-PowerPlate is a rolled product with 25 percent higher strength than 6061-T6 and improved machinability rating of "B" versus the conventional "C" for 6061-T651.
The Future *Fibral, Tempral and Certal are registered trademarks of Alcan Aluminum Limited (Montreal, Canada). This article appeared in the May/June issue of Aluminum Now, the in-house information journal of the Aluminum Association, Inc. The article was prepared courtesy of Secat, Inc. (Lexington, KY)-research resource for the aluminum industry. | ||||||||||
| MoldMaking Technology Online is a trademark of Gardner Publications, Inc, copyright 2008. MoldMaking Technology and all contents are properties of Gardner Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved. |