
FEATUREARTICLE
How to Select the Right Carbide Insert
The menu of available coatings for carbide inserts has expanded ten-fold in the past ten years. Selecting the one that can produce low cutting forces with smooth cutting action, good surface finish and long tool life becomes the user's dilemma.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
GETMOREINFO
For more information contact Krishnan Narasimhan, manager coating technology of Valenite (Madison Heights, MI) at (248) 589-6661 or via e-mail at krishnan_narasimhan@valenite.com.
Most moldmakers do not have the luxury of a machining lab or even the time to do machining evaluations for different cutting parameters. Short leadtimes and precision machining defines the work. New insert style cutter designs, particularly for milling, have improved the ability to quickly and efficiently rough-in mold cavities, and perform mold squaring and contouring as well as profiling and finishing. The development of multifunction milling tools that can use a wide variety of different insert style geometries now allows all types of milling to be performed with one cutter - providing more flexibility and lower cost. Some new modular milling system designs even allow the user to simply change milling heads on variable length adapter shanks to provide versatility. And with the addition of new "shrink-fit" toolholder technology that takes advantage of the performance benefits of induction heating, the toolholder and shrink-fitting a cutting tool into it, concentricity and rigidity for deep cavity tools have been greatly improved. These advancements have given the moldmaker better metal cutting options than have been previously available. But when it's all said and done, it's the carbide cutting tool insert that really makes it work. And the options here can be overwhelming. For example, it's not uncommon for a carbide insert manufacturer to have more than 20 different carbide substrate grades that can be coated with titanium nitride (TiN), titanium carbonitride (TiCN), titanium carbide (TiC), aluminum oxide (Al2O3), zirconium carbonitride (ZrCN), titanium aluminum nitride (TiAlN) or aluminum titanium nitride (AlTiN). These coatings can be applied individually or in combination by a physical deposition process (PVD) or a chemical deposition process (CVD) or even in a multi-layer CVD process that permits up to 70 ultra-thin layers to be deposited. Coatings do significantly improve wear resistance, increase tool life and enable higher speeds and feeds to be achieved. PVD and CVD coatings are differentiated by the deposition processing temperature. The PVD process is a lower temperature process providing a finer crack-resistant coating grain structure with a low coefficient of friction. As a result, PVD-coated inserts can have sharper cutting edges. Now add several of the cermet ceramic grades to the list and it is easy to see how proper selection can become a real nightmare. So it is important to first consider where and why insert failure occurs as well as some of the application basics for machining different mold materials. The recommendations for specific insert types will serve as a good starting point.
Tool Failure Analysis
Thermal cracking is accentuated by the use of coolants and high feedrates during machining. Conventional CVD-coated carbide tools often are limited in combating thermal crack resistance. Conventional CVD coatings like TiC, TiCN and TiN provide limited thermal barrier properties but have high stability, oxidation resistance and chemical resistance. Al2O3 or Al
Moderate temperature (~850'C) multi-layer MTCVD coatings like TiCN or ZrCN have lower magnitude of tensile stresses and are better suited to combine the properties of fracture toughness, abrasive wear resistance, chemical wear resistance and thermal crack resistance when used in combination with oxide coatings (see Figure 3).
In the last five years, there has been a tremendous advantage in using PVD coatings based on TiAlN compositions. The high oxidation resistance, high chemical stability, high hot hardness and enhanced thermal barrier properties of these types of PVD coatings facilitates their use in high-speed (1,000 to 1,500 sfm) dry machining applications. Without question, machining productivity is enhanced with the use of PVD TiAlN coatings (see Figure 4).
Mold Materials
Aluminum
Generally speaking, milling aluminum requires a C2 carbide grade for roughing and a C3 for finishing. These are general purpose milling grades with a medium grain that have excellent wear resistance for roughing and finishing applications where sharp edges are required. From 700 to 2,000 sfm can be achieved at a feed-per-tooth of .004 to .014. Also, TiC/TiCN cermet grades are ideal for wrought aluminum materials where good edge strength and lubricity are required. From 1,500 to 2,500 sfm can be achieved with these types of ceramic inserts. For endmills and face mills, feed-per-tooth usually ranges from .006 to .014 inches per tooth. Insert designs should have a good positive rake angle to insure that chips leave the cutting edge as quickly as possible (see Figure 5).
In most cases, uncoated carbide grades are all that is required. Aluminum is easy to cut and the added expense for any type of coating to improve wear life usually is hard to justify.
However, when very high-speed machining is being performed, PCD inserts brazed with poly-crystalline diamond are the insert of choice because of the superior finish that can be produced at elevated speeds.
Beryllium Copper
P20 Tool and Die Steel
With the various coatings, feedrates can be from .005 to .008 inches per tooth. Uncoated carbide grades also can be successfully used - those with good edge and impact strength. However, the slower machining speeds that are required are really impractical today.
It should be noted that harder tool steels - those over 45 Rc - also are being used today, all in an attempt to produce better surface finish and eliminate any polishing operations. A good starting point would be to try those cutting tool inserts that work on P20 steel and experiment with the feeds and speeds.
Ferritic and Martensitic Stainless Steels
High Temperature Alloys
Conclusion
In most cases, there never will be one cutting tool insert solution that works for everyone. There are too many variables with respect to different machines, various coolants, speeds and feeds, and machining environments. What this article has attempted to show, in as brief a context as possible here, are basic starting points for insert selection for the various mold materials. The ultimate selection is left to you, hopefully now possessing a better knowledge.
|
| MoldMaking Technology Online is a trademark of Gardner Publications, Inc, copyright 2008. MoldMaking Technology and all contents are properties of Gardner Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved. |